WRIT PETITION No.24590 of 2011 ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) None for the petitioner. Mr. Abu Akram, learned Standing Counsel for the  respondent No.2. Mr. S.Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel  representing M/s. Indus Law Firm, for the respondent  No.3. 2. In this petition, which has been filed as a public  interest litigation, the petitioner has prayed for the  following relief: “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it  is hereby prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased  to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in  the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction  of the respondents in not taking any action on the  Enquiry report, dated 24.07.2005 submitted by the then  Executive Officer and thereby not removing the encroachments on the Wakf property occupied by the 3rd respondent as being illegal, arbitrary, abdication of duty  cast on them, contrary to the settled principles of law  and contrary to Wakf Act, 1995, and violative of Article  14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct  the respondents No.1 and 2 to remove the  encroachments in an extent of Ac.2.24 Gts. situated in  Sy.No.182 of Hyderabad City, Sulthan Bagh, Kavadiguda, encroached by the 3rd respondent and take  back the possession and further to initiate action  against the 3rd respondent for encroaching the Wakf  property and pass such other order or orders as are  deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.â€ 3. Admittedly, after filing of the writ petition, the Waqf  Board, after conducting an enquiry, has issued a notice under Section 54 of the Waqf Act, 1995, and has filed a  civil suit, namely O.S.No.13 of 2014, as well before the  Wafq Tribunal with regard to the alleged encroachments on  its property. 4. In view of the subsequent events, the grievance of the  petitioner does not survive for consideration. 5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.